Bette Midler: Is it ‘hypocritical to be pro-life and anti gun control?’!/mosesmosesmoses/status/322410256388993025

The wind isn’t just beneath her wings; it’s between her ears.

Midler can’t wrap her head around the idea that being against abortion and in favor of the Second Amendment aren’t mutually exclusive:

Is it me or does it seem hypocritical to be pro-life and anti gun control?Just putting that out there…

— Bette Midler (@BetteMidler) April 11, 2013

Just putting it out there, huh? Allow us to just put some stuff out there:

.@bettemidler then explain the 400+ children killed last year in gun controlled

— hello moxy (@hellomoxy) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler Is it hypocritical to favor killing the innocent, and not the guilty?

— Lester Burnham (@BroodingPelican) April 11, 2013

Its our Right2Life & Liberty @bettemidler Is it me or does it seem hypocritical 2be pro-life & anti gun control? Just putting that out there

— cherie lee (@1littleangel2u) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler Armed security protects you. And that’s OK. But then you shouldn’t wonder why others deserve to protect their own lives.

— Melvin Udall (@Melvin_Udall_) April 11, 2013

Using @bettemidler‘s logic, she is pro-rape for supporting gun control. Guess Amanda Collins deserved it, eh Bette?…

— Rachel Veronica (@rachelveronica) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler I oppose people using guns to kill innocent people–but I do support a person’s right to own a gun to protect herself.

— C. L. Paur (@clpaur) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler So its okay to slaughter the un-born as some perceived right; but an actual right as per the Constitution is silly?

— Daniel LaMalfa (@cbyfrmhll) April 11, 2013

Maybe the laws just need a little tweaking:

@ibuymyownshit @bettemidler Maybe if abortion doctors used guns.

— Nation of Reason (@nationofreason) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler What if abortions were performed with guns?

— Hugo Hackenbush(@MangyLover) April 11, 2013

@bettemidler Seriously, if guns were used to perform abortions, wouldn’t you want them free and taxpayer provided, even to minors?

— Hugo Hackenbush(@MangyLover) April 11, 2013

Well, Bette? What say you?

Here’s what we think: we think that being pro-life means believing in protecting life. The Second Amendment helps to make that possible:

@bettemidler It’s pro-life to defend myself and my family with a gun.#2ndamendment

— AngelaCalabro (@AngelaCalabro) April 11, 2013

@bettemidlerBeing able to protect one’s self and family IS pro-life!

— Mary Bredlau (@BredlauMary) April 11, 2013




Bette Midler: Gun owners aren’t the wind beneath my wings

Bette Midler asks how much more death we’ll have at the hands of House Republicans

Midler mentions muskets, still meddling in gun control debate

Fact-challenged Bette Midler: ‘NRA only has 60,000 followers’

Bette Midler losing hope that hard-hearted cowards in Senate will pass assault weapon ban

As assault weapon ban languishes, Bette Midler pities ‘soon-to-be-slain’

Read more:

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


%d bloggers like this: